The Aristotelian notions of δύναμις and δυνατóν in Heidegger’s Möglichkeit of Sein und Zeit

Authors

  • Martín Nicolás Abraham National University of Jujuy (San Salvador de Jujuy, Jujuy, Argentina) | University of Buenos Aires (Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35305/cf2.vi19.165

Keywords:

hermeneutical phenomenology, Aristotle, dýnamis, dynatón, Möglichkeit

Abstract

In this paper, we start from the hypothesis that Heidegger has in mind the Aristotelian notions of δύναμις (dýnamis) and δυνατóν (dynatón), when he theorizes his concept of possibility (Möglichkeit) in Sein und Zeit, but not with the sole purpose of assimilating the aforementioned conceptualizations -appropriation that, as we will see subsequently, is not full-, but also, to radicalize them, assuming a frankly superior point of view. We support this thesis, in principle, on the fact that Aristotle thought that the ἐνέργεια (enérgeia) or ἐντελέχεια (entelécheia) is, in general terms, prior (πρότερον/próteron) with respect to the dýnamis. This theoretical position being revised and renewed by Heidegger in the reviewed text. In addition, Heidegger puts into question the Aristotelian thesis of fundamentality of Wirklichkeit (effective reality) and therefore the Aristotelian concept of being (εἶναι/eînai), ἐστίν (estín) or what it is (ὄν/ón), indicating not only that the possibility is more original than the effective reality, but also that the realization of a possibility never implies the transition to an effective reality. In addition, the Heidegger's link with Aristotle began very early -more specifically, in the year 1907-, thanks to the reading of Franz Brentano's doctoral thesis, and has continued constantly since 1921, when Heidegger gave a seminar on De Anima at the University of Freiburg.

References

Ackrill, J. L. (2013). Aristotles’s distinction between enérgeia and kinesis. En R. Bambrough (Ed.), New essays on Plato and Aristotle, V. III (pp. 121-142). Routledge.

Aristóteles (2014). Metafísica. Editorial Gredos.

Beere, J. (2010). Doing and Being. An interpretation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics Theta. Oxford University Press.

Berti, E. (2011). Estructura y significado de la Metafísica de Aristóteles. Oinos.

Bertorello, A. (2012). Una interpretación semiótico-narrativa del sistema de las modalidades en Sein und Zeit. En F. De Lara (Ed.), Studia Heideggeriana, V. II (pp. 57-70). Teseo-Sociedad Iberoamericana de Estudios Heideggerianos.

Brentano, F. (1862). Von der mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seienden nach Aristoteles. Herder.

Cleary, J. J. (1988). Aristotle on the many senses of priority. Southern Illinois University Press.

Heidegger, M. (1967). Sein und Zeit. Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Heidegger, M. (1979). Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs (GA 20). Vittorio Klostermann.

Heidegger, M. (1993). Die Grundbegriffe der antiken Philosophie (GA 22). Vittorio Klostermann.

Heidegger, M. (2007). Mein Weg in die Phänomenologie (GA 14). Vittorio Klostermann.

Jansen, L. (2016). Tun und Können. Ein systematischer Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ Theorie der Vermögen im neunten Buch der Metaphysik. Springer VS.

Mascaró, L. (2017). Desmundanización, tematización y objetivación: las claves para la interpretación de la filosofía de la ciencia de Heidegger en el período de Marburgo. Límite. Revista Interdisciplinaria de Filosofía y Psicología, 12 (38), 49-59.

Reis, R. (2014). Aspectos da Modalidade: A Nocão de Possibilidade na Fenomenología Hermenéutica. Via Verita.

Satller, J. (2011). Phänomenologie und Ontologie bei Oskar Becker. Fernuniversität Hagen.

Volpi, F. (2012). Heidegger y Aristóteles. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Wolf, U. (2020). Vermögen und Möglichkeit. Die Lehre des Aristoteles und die Debatte in der analytischen Philosophie. J.B. Metzler.

Published

2022-12-21

How to Cite

Abraham, M. N. (2022). The Aristotelian notions of δύναμις and δυνατóν in Heidegger’s Möglichkeit of Sein und Zeit. Cuadernos Filosóficos / Segunda Época, (19). https://doi.org/10.35305/cf2.vi19.165

Issue

Section

Papers