An analysis of the unit by analogy from the geometric models in the De Incessu Animalium and the De Motu Animalium
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35305/cf2.vi17.84Keywords:
Aristotle, biology, analogy, models, geometryAbstract
In this article I explore certain modeling in Aristotle's zoological work. In particular, I am interested in the type of theoretical schemes in which Aristotle does not claim anatomical or physiological precision because they refer to more than one genus of animals or their parts or activities. On the one hand, I analyse the triaxial scheme of the faculties of animals in the De Incessu Animalium 4, in which the dimensions are defined not by their position but by a function. On the other hand, I examine the diagram of the De Motu Animalium 9, in which Aristotle concludes that the material middle of the animal, the heart, cannot originate simultaneous movements, so there must be something that moves without being moved. I believe that this model also distinguishes its elements not by their positions but their functions. The geometric terms assigned in each case account for certain functions of animals, presenting a double value of the analogy: between the animal domain and the geometric one, and granting the necessary generality to capture the similarity between different genus within the animal domain itself.
References
Bartolomé, S. & Marcos, A. (2010). Aristóteles. Obra biológica (De Partibus Animalium, De Motu Animalium, De Incessu Animalium). Luarna.
Bénatouïl, T. (2004). L’usage des anologies dans le De Motu Animalium. En A. Laks & M. Rashed (eds.), Aristote et le mouvement des animaux. Dix études sur le De Motu Animalium (pp. 81-114). Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
Candel, M. (1996). Aristóteles. Acerca del cielo. Meteorológicos. Gredos.
Carbone, A. (2005). La représentation de l’organisation spatiale du corps chez Aristote. Universite de Paris-Pantheon-Sorbonne.
De Groot, J. (2008). Dunamis and the Science of Mechanics: Aristotle on Animal Motion. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 46(1), 43–68.
Falcon, A. (2017). The Place of the De Motu Animalium in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy. En W. Wians & R. Polansky (eds.), Reading Aristotle. Argument and Exposition (pp. 215-235). Brill.
Jiménez Sánchez-Escariche, E. & Alonso Miguel, A. (2000). Aristóteles. Partes de los animales. Marcha de los animales. Movimiento de los animales. Gredos.
Lennox, J. (2009). De caelo 2.2 and its debt to the De Incessu Animalium. En A.C. Bowen & C. Wildberg (eds.), New perspectives on Aristotle's De caelo (pp. 187-214). Brill.
Lloyd, G.E.R. (1996). Unity of analogy. En Aristotelian Explorations (pp. 138-159). Cambridge University Press.
Macagno, F. (2017). The logical and pragmatic structure of arguments from analogy. Logique & Analyse, 240, 465-89.
Marcos, A. (1996). Aristóteles y otros animales: una lectura filosófica de la biología aristotélica. Promociones y Publicaciones Universitarias.
Nussbaum, M.C. (1985). Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium. Princeton University Press.
Owen, G.E.L. (1986). Aristotelian Mechanics. En M. Nussbaum (ed.), Logic, Science, and Dialectics (pp. 315-333). Cornell University Press.
Pasquale, A.A. (2016). El modelo geométrico y el movimiento circular en el De Motu Animalium de Aristóteles. Tesis de grado. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/tesis/te.1286/te.1286.pdf
Vita, V. (1982). Il punto nella terminologia matematica greca. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 27(2), 101-114.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Angel Augusto Pasquale
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CF2 publishes works under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-ND 4.0). This allows commercial or non-commercial distribution, as long as the work is made available in full and without any modifications, and the original author and first publication in the journal are acknowledged.
By simply submitting a piece of work for evaluation and publication, authors transfer the journal the right to first publication under the aforementioned license. Authors can independently and additionally celebrate other contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version published in this journal (e.g. to include their work in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided that they clearly state their work was first published by CF2.
Text of the license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/legalcode
